Which of the following quotations—from documents associated with the American, French and Haitian revolutions—exemplifies social contract theory? A. "...considering that ignorance, neglect or contempt of the rights of man are the sole causes of public misfortunes and governmental corruption..."

B. "Restored to our primitive dignity, we have asserted our rights; we swear never to yield them to any power on earth."

C. " ...That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it..."

D. "The demands of the citizens may always tend toward maintaining the constitution and the general welfare."

C. " ...That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it..."

Explanation:

The Social Contract Theory says that people choose to form political entities because they agree to be ruled by governments only when these goverments act for the common good. According to this theory, it is the right of the people to change the government in case of general disagreement with it.

This is one of the theories that justified the American Revolution, and the French Revolution, and the Haitian Revolution.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.