Identify the 5 stages of grief and then write a statement for each stage of the grieving process for someone who lost his or her home in a natural disaster.

Explanation:

Denial stage- Here the victim tend to deny the existence of the loss,making it seems what has happened cannot happen and it is not real. The person deny's the occurence of the disaster

Anger stage is where the grieved person tend to accuse himself of not been protective enough to have allowed the danger happened.

Bargaining stage at this stage the grieved had agreed that the incident occur but want to bargain with God or a superior being if all the loss guild be restored after doing some certain things. If God could restore all he had lost to the disaster that he would serve him

Depression stage occurs after the person had admit that the incidence has happened and the hand of time cannot be turned back the person may be sick, sad, lack appetite for food

Acceptance stage is the stage the grieved come to accept the reality of what had happened even though not happy with the situation. He accept that the disaster really happened and had affected him.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

you so !