In which of the following types of cases does a plaintiff attempt to prove that while an employer's policy or practice appears to apply to everyone equally, its actual effect is that it disproportionately limits employment opportunities for a protected class? A. Disparate-treatment cases
B. Disparate-impact cases
C. Sexual harassment cases
D. All the above
E. Disparate-treatment cases and disparate-impact cases, but not sexual harassment cases

B. Disparate-impact cases

Explanation:

Disparate-impact treatment is a situation where an employee is treated differently or less favorably because they belong to a protected class such as gender, religion or age.

When an employers policies are not biased but then have a disproportionate impact on such protected groups we call it a disparate-impact case.

the boundarys like convergent divergent and transform it causes subduction

hello,

answer: a federal government has final authority on interstate/inter provincial  and international affairs, a confederation is one where the central/national government or authority is governing body what does not have final say over the same matters. hopefully this and i will try again if you don't like this answer : )

best of luck!