Fred is conducting research for Burger King to find out if the Chesapeake community prefers their burgers or McDonalds. Fred draws his sample from Burger King
customers and decides that the majority of Chesapeake's civilians overwhelmingly
prefers Burger King. His research is an example of a misrepresentation because:
_Fred failed to consider an intervening variable
_Fred used a random sample
_Fred used a convenience sample
_Fred asked biased questions

Linda, mike, and carol all call their group leader by her first name, juanita. a fifth group member, leslie, calls her ʺms. garcia.ʺ leslie has not accepted:

Ascientist successfully predicts the outcome of an experiment. you watch carefully and know he didn't cheat. the scientist's success shows that: a) the scientist knows absolute truth about this experiment; success is not possible unless you know the truthb) the scientist was just lucky; no one ever knows what's going on, so successful predictions require luckc) the scientist may know the truth, or at least know something that is close to the truth, or the scientist may have gotten lucky this time; you can't be absolutely sured) the scientist really was cheating, even though you didn't see the cheating; no one can get things right, except by cheatinge) the scientist spent the night at a particular hotel chain and go a free breakfast, giving the scientist the ability to do amazing things

The defendant, angered because a rival gang member had twice beaten him up after school, obtained a heavy lead pipe and waited in a deserted alleyway which he knew the rival took as a route home every day after school. when his enemy came walking down the alley, the defendant leapt out behind him and smashed the pipe into the victim's head, knocking him to the ground. the defendant then rolled the victim over and pounded his face with 15 to 20 heavy blows with the lead pipe, killing him. the jurisdiction defines first degree murder as murder committed with premeditation and deliberation. all other murders are defined as second degree murders. why will the defendant be convicted of first degree murder (as opposed to second degree murder)?