Why do not sea falling Apple attracting the earth toward it selp why??
.

The greater the combined masses and the closer they are to one another the stronger the force of gravity would be.

Explanation:

Why we don't see that a falling apple is attracting the earth towards itself is because the greater the combined masses and the closer they are to one another the stronger the force of gravity would be.

The force of gravity react on either one or two object to pull them closer or together, and this is simply measured by the masses of the objects and the gap between them.

Due to Newton's third law of motion which states that when an object applies force on another object, the other object applies the same force in opposite direction on the first object, His third law in a simplest form states that for every action which can also be refer to as force in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction. Simply means, if object A apply a force on object B, then object B also apply an equal and opposite force on object A.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

"choosing is refusing" means individuals face an opportunity cost with each decision they make. economists state that every decision involves trade-offs. opportunity cost is the least desirable alternative given up as a result of a decision.