You and your friend James are fans of rival soccer teams. In a recent and highly publicized match, your preferred team wins against James's team by a score of 7-0. You take advantage of this victory to repeatedly tell James that his team is inferior and does not deserve to play in the league. You send James emails with photos of the goal scoring players. James is clearly annoyed hearing about the loss, but you continue to pester him anyway. After two days of this behavior and having made your point, you decide to move on. James has not, however, moved on and is threatening you with a lawsuit. Discuss your potential liability for your conduct and the likelihood of James' success.

Basis of the fact presented here, in this case, is given below:-

Explanation:

There is no legal liability for me (that's the basis of the minimal details are available here), yes James can file a lawsuit, or he might n't really get a fair hearing if it reaches too far away from the judge.

The opportunities that his defamation suit application will not even be acknowledged as the act in this situation doesn't always involve anything that's been done with both the inappropriate intent of harming James or stealing his money or any significant injury. Irritating somebody somewhere isn't a crime, till the behavior has affected the person.

answer; i believe the correct answer is customer,manufacturer, service provider,general public ; quality is primarily the responsibility of all all employees in the organization.

every society, in order to meet the needs of it's people, has to answer three basic questions:

- what should we produce?

- how should we produce it?

- for whom should we produce it?

this questions must be answered in order to, option b, aid in production decisions.

every country can't produce everything, no matter how rich their land is. it may be a matter of technology, resources or geographical conditions. so, these three questions must be resolved in order to get the most of the production of each land.

hope this !