A researcher conducts an experiment on human memory and recruits 15 people to participate in her study. She performs the experiment and analyzes the results. She uses a ttest for a mean and obtains a p-value of 0.17. Which of the following is a reasonable interpretation of her results? Group of answer choices This proves that her experimental treatment has no effect on memory. If there is a treatment effect, the sample size was too small to detect it. She should reject the null hypothesis. There is evidence of a small effect on memory by her experimental treatment.

This proves that her experimental treatment has no effect on memory

Explanation:

In an experimental setup, if the P valvue is less than 0.05, then there is a significant effect in the stated hypothesis being tested for.

In the case of the researcher, for her toget a p value as 0.17 which is above the 0.05 shows that there her experimental treatment has no effect on human memory.

explanation:

allergens: overstimulate the nerve system

neurotics: attack nerve cells

mutagens: damage or otherwise alter dna sequence

generators: cause defects during growth and development  

carcinogens: cause unchecked cell growth

i hope you get the idea according to me these are the effects that happened.

the earthquake in haiti was a magnitude of 7.0 according to the u.s geological survey yet the smaller earthquake in haiti killed more than 200,000 and left more than 1.2 million people homeless. the chile earthquake was a magnitude of 8.8 and 500 times more stronger but chile's earthquake only injured 712 people.