subject
Social Studies, 06.05.2020 03:27 Ramone8070

It is well documented that people have positive responses to some words, such as "kind" and "wonderful" and negative responses to others, such as "evil" and "nausea." Recently, psychological experiments have revealed that people also have positive or negative responses to many nonsense words. This shows that people’s responses to words are conditioned not only by what the words mean, but also by how they sound. The boldface portion plays which one of the following roles in the argument?

A) It is a premise offered in support of the conclusion that people have either a positive or a negative response to any word.

B) It is a conclusion for which the only support provided is the claim that people’s responses to words are conditioned both by what the words mean and by how they sound.

C) It is a generalization partially supported by the claim that meaningful words can trigger positive or negative responses in people.

D) It is a premise offered in support of the conclusion that people’s responses to words are engendered not only by what the words mean, but also by how they sound.

E) It is a conclusion supported by the claim that people’s responses under experimental conditions are essentially different from their responses in ordinary situations.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30, shakebays
What is the role of institutions in society - do they perform positive functions, or simply work in the interests of the powerful and against the powerless? (a related question here is why do our life chances vary by class, gender and ethnicity)
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00, morgaaaan3835
Knowing that you will be punished for breaking mom's favorite dish is a function of the
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00, bremarie102013
“dear sir: it is with great reluctance, i trouble you on a subject, which does not fall within your province; but it is a subject that occasions me more distress, than i have felt, since the commencement of the war; and which loudly demands the most zealous exertions of every person of weight and authority, who is interested in the success of our affairs. i mean the present dreadful situation of the army for want of provisions, and the miserable prospects before us, with respect to futurity. it is more alarming than you will probably conceive, for, to form a just idea, it were necessary to be on the spot. for some days past, there has been little less, than a famine in camp. a part of the army has been a week, without any kind of flesh, and the rest for three or four days. naked and starving as they are, we cannot enough admire the incomparable patience and fidelity of the soldiery, that they have not been ere this excited by their sufferings, to a general mutiny or dispersion. strong symptoms, however, discontent have appeared in particular instances; and nothing but the most acitive efforts every where can long avert so shocking a catastrophe.” what’s the central idea?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:40, rousedem28381
Chris, a master at office gossip and innuendo, says, "we know we have a corporate spy someplace in the organization, probably on the management team itself. there is no evidence that it is audrey. in fact, she's too clean, if you know what i mean. somebody should fire audrey; she's got to be the spy." by making this argument chris is actually engaging in (a) an appeal to emotion fallacy (b) a straw man fallacy (c) an appeal to ignorance fallacy (d) circular reasoning (e) an appeal to the mob fallacy
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
It is well documented that people have positive responses to some words, such as "kind" and "wonderf...

Questions in other subjects: