subject
Social Studies, 27.04.2020 01:36 kate460

What was the outcome of United States v. Nixon?
A. All executive department became independent.
B. Congress took over some of the president's roles.
C. Presidents could no longer belong to political parties.
D. Executive privilege became more limited.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30, anthonybowie99
How did the mali empire come to an end? a. rulers lost control of gao. b. they were conquered by axum. c. ghana took over their territory. d. sundiata was captured by mansa musa brainliest!
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:10, bwalker411
Speaker 1: now that we are independent, americans should create a government that mirrors the government of great britain. speaker 2: after experiencing a tyranny of great britain, americans know how important it is to limit the government's power. speaker 3: our victory in the revolutionary war prove that americans have wisdom to choose good leaders. speaker 4: as for former colonies, the american states are likely to thrive under a system of strong centralized government. which speaker would most likely support the government established by the articles of confederation? a. speaker 2 b. speaker 3 c. speaker 1 d. speaker 4
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00, Amyra2003
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u. s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30, Desireeloves8849
The map shows the allied strategy in the pacific. what does the movement of allied troops reveal about their strategy? the allies’ objective was to reach japan as soon as possible. the allies kept getting diverted in their quest to reach japan. the allies overtook outlying islands to make access to japan easier. the allies retreated just before they reached the first set of islands.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What was the outcome of United States v. Nixon?
A. All executive department became independent...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Social Studies, 26.08.2019 09:10