Why was vaccination a better alternative to inoculation in the fight against
smallpox? OR How has inoculation made a difference throughout history?

vaccination was better because it provided the required immunity without having to infect the individual with small pox postulates as seen with inoculation

Explanation:

Vaccination was a better alternative to inoculation in the fight against smallpox because vaccination provided a person with a vaccine/immunity in their system which helped them fight/prevent the contraction of smallpox. while inoculation in the fight against smallpox involved the introduction of small pox postulates int the skin of an individual which still had an effect in building up the immunity against contracting small pox naturally. Inoculation was used before proper vaccination was discovered and it made a difference in history in the treatment of deadly diseases.

new communications technology has affected the way social movements are organized because nowadays, social movements rely on social networks and the media to get different people with a similar way of thinking in contact, and thus, get them to mobilize for a greater cause.

individuals only participate in collective action when they feel identified with it. is in this aspect that social media becomes relevant, because it guarantees communication among all individuals and organizes the social actions that are going to be carried out, i.e., the social movements.

in addition, being covered by the media is important to validate the message and make it relevant in the social agenda, as well as to reach more people who can share interests, appealing to public sympathy for their cause.

in conclusion, it is by social networks and social media that social movement is given birth; by connecting different individuals with similar ideas and organizing them to mobilize for a greater cause.

is there a year set? the question is incomplete