(A) Identify and define the rule of evidence the Court used in Mapp v Ohio.
(B) Identify and define which of Dollaree Mapp’s Constitutional protections the determined had been violated.
(C) Explain the Constitutional principle the Court used to come to its holding.
(D) Describe another Supreme Court decision that protected the rights of individuals accused of crime. Be detailed in your description and specifically address the similarities and differences in the cases.

Which statement best describes evidence of a mulitcultural mix in east africa? a. because of what he learned during his pilgrimage to mecca, mansa musa was able to build a center of islamic scholarship. b. the traders of ghana brought back with them slaves from the mediterranean who taught the ghana rulers about christianity. c. clans were made up of lineages that were descendants of multiple ancestors from different regions of africa. d. swahili became a language made up of words spoken by traders along the coast of the indian ocean.

1. in the debate for the student council election, a student candidate quoted explicit lyrics from a popular song. the school suspended him for two days, in line with school policy. 2. a student sued the school over its policy of holding two proms: one for african american students and one for white students. - are these civil or criminal cases? how do you know? - which court has original jurisdiction in the case: state court, federal court, or the u. s. supreme court? -. where will the case go next if it is appealed?

In which type of economy are these decisions made by the producers , consumers, and the goverment?