Robert didn't mince words. If a person's ideas were ill-considered, he was likely to tell them that their ideas were bad. If there was a disagreement, he plainly stated that the person with the opposing viewpoint was wrong. To some, his manner was abrasive and uncollegial and this was a source of:

a. Interpersonal conflict.

b. Administrative conflict.

c. Interactionist conflict.

d. Goal-oriented conflict.

Option A                  

Explanation:

Note how Robert does not establish a form of trad-able and questionable conflict. His aim was not to enable conversations which could lead to issue-solving and goal accomplishment. His intention is simply to assert his case, say that he is correct and that somebody else is incorrect, without any regard for the mental anguish that he may trigger. That's just what interpersonal dispute is: a difference of opinion between an organisation's individual or group resulting in frustration and disappointment.

apart from being against desegregation, governor of georgia eugene talmadge opposed as well to the work progress administration, an ambitious program of the "new deal" created by president franklin d. roosevelt to overcome the great depression after world war i. talmadge disagreed with welfare spending, job training and organized labor. according to his ideas, he thought the government was spending too much money on this, and he wasn't willing to accept a wage higher than georgia's lower average wage. besides, talmadge strongly opposed to the "new deal" as he thought it had communist ideas.