When considering the design of a new building, an architect is considering using steel or wood as the material. Looking at the entire life of the building, which statement would support using wood as the material for the building?

wood is a renewable resource while steel is non-renewable

Explanation:

Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the one of the supporting statements for wood would be that wood is a renewable resource while steel is non-renewable. Meaning that if mistakes or changes need to be made the same wood can be reused. Also at the end of the life-cycle of the house, when it is torn down the entirety of the wood used can be repurposed for another usage.

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.

answer; /// i believe the correct answer is general act charters;