Social Studies, 21.04.2020 16:57 amf14

First: Analyze and evaluate Descartes’ two proofs of God's existence. How are they different? Is one more convincing than the other? And secondly: How does Descartes explain how we humans make mistakes (errors)? Do not just state that a perfect creator made imperfect humans, this is NOT his answer. Descartes has several ideas on why we make mistakes and how we go wrong. Are Descartes' arguments convincing to you? Why or why not?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: kinslou6506

Check Explanation

Explanation:

Rene Descartes, a French philosopher, mathematician, and scientist, provided two great proof of God's existence which is known as "Two Proof of God’s Existence"

The first proof was that everything and beings In this world was created, and that a living or non living thing can't not be created on there own.

The second proof is that there is a power that is presserving human and no human being possess such powers except a divine being

The DIFFERENCE between the two proof stated above is that one stated that humans don't have powers on there own for preservation while the first stated that humans can not be created on there own. He made futher clarification that every object is created by someone. So, humans have Creator. The first proof talks about how Humans can not be created on it own which mean God is supreme and he his perfect while the second proof is that there Is a POWER behind human creation,means that in studying humans philosophy Which concerned Humans Attribute, such powers can't be control by humans Both proofs look alike but are different in meaning.

Both proof supports each other. The first proof, talking about human having a Creator directly talks about God powers and if the second proof supports it by looking at human philosophy, that is; if any humans study his or her attribute, the truth will be seen that humans being don't possess the powers to be created on it own.

Humans beings Made ERRORS according to Descartes, he said that the idea of perfectness was necessary because humans must exist has imperfect beings and only by that can humans knows that God is the Creator. If humans can only knows that there is creator behind them,if they made mistakes as imperfect beings. So, that the idea of perfectness will always be on humans mind

Furthermore, he said finite intellect is the source of human errors, many humans taught that they can achieve things without the creator,so they made ERRORS

DESCARTES argument are convincing Enough. The reason is that DESCARTES also proof this using the philosophy of humanity Which concerned human attribute. In human philosophy, powers

that preserve can't be possess by Humans and he also made use of "nothing comes from nothing" .In the philosophy of humans, it supports this as well.

Answer from: Quest

this can !

- jack watson

Answer from: Quest

this headline suggests that midterm congressional elections are at the corner and trump administration wants to activate his base by vowing to clamp down on immigrants and immigration as trump had said during his election campaign around two years ago. when a baby is born in usa, the baby becomes citizen of usa for 85 years and trump wants to end this rule of birthright citizenship to control illegal immigration and this what he said in an interview""we’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the united states for 85 years, with all of those benefits,” "

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30, july00

Recently, there has been pressure to loosen clean air standards. use economic arguments to support or oppose this proposed action.

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:40, CM0

"there will be differences in degree of mood elevation seen in depressed clients after receiving either cognitive-behavioral or psychoanalytic therapy."; in this hypothesis, mood elevation is the:

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30, GingerSnaps

The police of a resort town discovered that a well-known cat burglar was currently living in town under an assumed name. to try to catch her in the act of burglary, an undercover officer approached the burglar with a plan for a burglary. the undercover officer told the burglar that he knew who she was and that he had a plan to steal jewels from someone staying in one of the town's resorts. the burglar initially refused the offer; however, after lengthy cajoling, she finally agreed to the plan. as the time for the burglary drew near, the burglar had second thoughts. three hours before the theft was scheduled to take place, the burglar called the police and told them of the plan. she told them that she was not going to show up, but that her cohort (the undercover officer) would be there, and told them how to recognize the undercover officer. is the burglar guilty of conspiracy at common law?

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:20, pattydixon6

Steven spielberg's classic movie jaws was a thriller about a great white shark that terrorized tourists at a local beach. just before the shark's appearance, eerie music began playing. as the unseen shark came closer, the tempo of the music picked up. after the audience had experienced this a few times, the sound of the music triggered the emotional reaction of fear in the audience even though the shark still had not appeared. at that point, the sound of the eerie music was a: a) unconditioned response (ucr) b) conditioned response (cr) c) conditioned stimulus (cs) d) unconditioned stimulus (ucs)

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

First: Analyze and evaluate Descartes’ two proofs of God's existence. How are they different? Is one...