Select the answer that best characterizes the argument below.
Witness Clark testified that he saw the defendant emerge from the burgled house with an expensive camera. But, members of the jury, you should reject this testimony because Clark suffers from brain damage, and he has trouble remembering things accurately.

A) Appeal to unqualified authority.
B) No fallacy.
C) Argument against the person, circumstantial.
D) Appeal to ignorance.
E) Appeal to pity.

B) No fallacy.

Explanation:

No fallacy is the situation in which no faulty or false meaning, reasoning or factors are included in formation of argument. No mistaken belief is involved .

According to the question, no fallacy is the request that is made for Clark's side as he has not made up any false statement rather it is his brain damage condition that makes him forget things.Thus, testimony should be cancelled.

Other options are incorrect because appeal to ignorance, pity appeal,unqualified authority appeal and Argument against the person, circumstantial is not depicted through scenario. Thus, the correct option is option(B).  

it gave them more rights

trade regulation is a field of law, often bracketed with antitrust (as in the phrase “antitrust and trade regulation law”), including government regulation of unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive business acts or practices. antitrust law is often considered a subset of trade regulation law. franchise and distribution law, consumer protection law, and advertising law are sometimes considered parts of trade regulation law.

in general the theory of economics says that the more open to trade a country is the better   the result for the same country and the whole economies.

in real life countries impose taxes, quotas, etc which is not so good for the economies.

this kind of commercial war between the usa and china is slowing down the growth of the whole world so we can say that it is a draw back of trade regulations. and the free trade agreements are benefits of trade regulations.