HEY GUYS, YOU GET 15 POINTS FOR ANSWERING CORRECTLY SO PLZ TRY
DETERMINE: Central Ideas In what way do the people “direct” the American democracy, according to Tocqueville?

SUMMERIZE: What impressed Tocqueville during his time in America? Cite examples to support your answer.

DRAW CONCLUSIONS: In what way could Tocqueville’s book be relevant today?

Ateam of men and women of different ethnic backgrounds, age, and physical capabilities work for a tv show which involves decorating gardens in a very short time frame. the team worked in co-ordination to come up with new decorative ideas for each episode. this is an example ofa team of men and women of different ethnic backgrounds, age, and physical capabilities work for a tv show which involves decorating gardens in a very short time frame. the team worked in co-ordination to come up with new decorative ideas for each episode. this is an example of

Based on this map, what can be concluded about the inca empire? (4 points) it was in a highlands region. it was in a mountainous region. it was in the amazon basin. it was in north america.

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.