The doctrine of means that statements made spontaneously by anyone at the time of an alleged negligent act are admissible as evidence, and they may be damaging to the dentist and dental assistant in a court of law.

Me with this psychology homework, i’m struggling with it.

Recall that in one condition of the experiment conducted by stasser and titus (1985) about student council president candidates, all group members had access to the same information, and that in another condition, members had unique information that other group members didn't know. in the second (unshared information) condition, the group made a worse decision than in the first (shared information) condition. this occurred because groups seldom can agree on who is most expert. focus discussion on the information that all members know. often ignore dissenting opinions. avoid differences of opinion, given conformity pressures.

When should you question a sources credibility