Which of the following statements about the Civil War is FALSE?
a.
As Union forces advanced through the South, many slaves were sent to Texas.
b.
Union blockades prohibited imported goods from Europe from reaching the South.
c.
The South had superior weapons and outnumbered the North on the battlefield.
d.
In the South, parched sweet potatoes were used as a substitute for making coffee when coffee became too difficult to get.

Which graph shows the temporary relationship between the aggregate price level and the aggregate quantity supplied? a. long-run aggregate supply curve b. aggregate demand curve c. short-run aggregate supply curve d. point of equilibrium

If we can't separate our civilized self from our savage self which will take over and why

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.