Think about whether access to sugary beverages should be regulated.

It may not seem like a political question, but how a person answers it may be affected by political ideology.

For example, which statement is most aligned with a conservative or libertarian perspective?

Legislators should ban the drinks to protect citizens’ health.
Government needs to regulate the beverage maker for producing an unhealthy product.
Elected officials need to fund programs that educate students about their health.
Government regulation is not the best way to solve this problem.

The perspective of a conservative or a libertarian would be that the government regulation is not the best way to solve this problem.

These set of people would want the government to leave the choice of drinking sugary beverages to the people.

According to them, people need to have autonomy from the government. Also they believe in the freedom of choice and individualism.

Therefore from the beliefs that they hold due they would say that the  government regulation is not the best way to solve this problem.

Read more on link

A conservative or libertarian perspective would align with the idea that government regulation is not the best way to solve this problem.

Explanation:

In regards to the issue of regulating sugary drinks, a conservative perspective would stress that the government should not intervene in the control of such products, that it is up to the individual consumer to make their own decisions and that companies should not be subject to government controls if there is a demand for a product. The rights of corporations to earn profits take precedence over the well being of individuals. Libertarians are generally against any restrictions on individual freedoms by the government.  

question 1: the kuwaiti government announced us$1.5 million in aid for rohingya refugees.they pointed out that it was imperative to take immediate and concrete steps to ramp up pressure on myanmar to put an end to the violence.and said   that they r just shameful

question 2: the rohingyas were not aloud to be seen as people in myanmar.in the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of rohingya were making perilous journeys out of myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.the latest exodus began on 25 august 2017 after rohingya arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.rohingyas arriving in an area known as cox's bazaar - a district in bangladesh - say they fled after troops, backed by local buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.

this is not a question