One advantage of peer evaluations is that: a) peers are less politically motivated than supervisors. b) peers may work harder to help other employees improve performance. c) peers may furnish more accurate and valid information than supervisors. d) peers are often partially responsible for the performance of other co-workers.

C) Peers may furnish more accurate and valid information than supervisors.

Explanation:

Peer evaluation can be said to be an effective collaborative learning strategy that encourages students to critically examine a task and its performance, then communicate constructive suggestions for improvement.

Peer Evaluation or Peer assessment or Peer review is a type of performance evaluation that is done by one or more people of matching competencies or in the same level or the same team.

This method is used to preserve the quality and standard of a task or performance at a desired level and to improve productivity and performance.

Peer assessment can also be an educational activity in were students judge the performance of their peers.

From the text, one of its advantage is that, more accurate and valid information can be obtained from Peer evaluation than when the evaluation is done by a supervisor.

i think it is the third one.

sir frederic attributed inaccuracies to schemas. memory reconstruction is one part actual events and one part personal schema, which can result in inaccuracies when memories are reconstructed.