The money multiplier will be .
a. larger if banks hold on to excess reserves but smaller if private citizens hold on to cash.
b. smaller if banks hold on to excess reserves but larger if private citizens hold on to cash.
c. smaller if either banks hold on to excess reserves or private citizens hold on to cash.
d. larger if either banks hold on to excess reserves or private citizens hold on to cash.
e. constant whether or not banks and citizens try to alter their holdings of excess reserves and cash.

A

Explanation:

The money multiplier is the amount of money that banks generate with each dollar of reserves which is the amount of deposits. So in A the money multiplier will be larger if banks hold on to excess reserves and it will be smaller if private citizens hold on to cash, i.e. they don´t deposit the money in the banks.

A. larger if banks hold on to excess reserves but smaller if private citizens hold on to cash.

Explanation:

The multiplier effect refers to the proportional amount of increase in final income that results from an injection of spending. Alternatively, a multiplier effect can also work in reverse, showing a proportional decrease in income when spending falls. Generally, economists are usually the most interested in how capital infusions positively affect income. Most economists believe that capital infusions of any kind, whether it be at the governmental or corporate level, will have a broad snowball effect on various aspects of economic activity

The primary factor is the bank's perception of risk. ... But, if banks feel that a lot of people may come in and request their money, it might cause a “run on the bank” so they have to reduce their lending in order to have enough cash on hand to avoid that. This will reduce the money multiplier.

Money Multiplier and Reserve Ratio. Money Multiplier refers to how an initial deposit can lead to a bigger final increase in the total money supply. For example, if the commercial banks gain deposits of £1 million and this leads to a final money supply of £10 million. The money multiplier is 10.

the old way of life was represented by superstition, an angry god, and absolute submission to authority. the thinkers of the age of reason ushered in a new way of thinking. this new way championed the accomplishments of humankind. individuals did not have to accept despair. science and reason could bring happiness and progress. kings did not rule by divine right. they had an obligation to their subjects. europeans pondered the implications for nearly a century. americans put them into practice first.