The Stanford Prison Experiment was aborted because:
a. Another researcher found that particip...
Social Studies, 04.04.2020 10:55 twhalon72
The Stanford Prison Experiment was aborted because:
a. Another researcher found that participants were being harmed by the procedures in unanticipated ways.
b. Participants were not being paid enough.
c. Participants complained that they had not provided informed consent.
d. The principal researcher, Dr. Zimbardo, was able to determine that participants were being harmed because he was objectively monitoring the procedures.
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: Social Studies
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:00, fatimalandau54
When employing the core learning system, reading text books and attending class are important ways to knowledge.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30, axleon11
The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:00, Legojackson78
Awife was having an affair with her neighbor. the wife and her husband had a prenuptial agreement that prevented the wife from receiving any of the husband’s sizable fortune in the event of a divorce. the wife and her neighbor formed a plan to murder the husband and run away together with the wife’s inheritance. the neighbor shot the husband one evening, killing him instantly, then drove to a town 100 miles away and checked into a motel. later that night, the police showed up at the motel with a valid warrant for the neighbor’s arrest. after the neighbor was arrested and placed in a police car, the police asked the motel clerk for permission to search the room, and the clerk granted the request. the police found the gun hidden in the tank of the toilet. the wife and the neighbor were each charged with first-degree murder and tried separately. at her trial, the wife sought to suppress any evidence of the gun, arguing that it was seized illegally. what is the prosecution’s strongest response to this argument? athe motel clerk gave the police permission to search the room. bthe wife was not staying in the motel room where the gun was found. cthe gun was found in a search incident to a lawful arrest. dthe neighbor did not have a reason
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Questions in other subjects:
Arts, 13.03.2020 04:56
Mathematics, 13.03.2020 04:56
