There were several experiments conducted by researchers to evaluate children's susceptibility to suggestive questioning. Even though these studies show a significant proportion of children changing their accounts in response to misleading questions, these studies probably still underestimate the children's tendency to agree with misleading questions. Here are the reasons for such underestimation, except: .A) The questioning techniques in real cases were much more forceful than in experiments. B) In real cases, children were questioned multiple times by different interviewers. C) The information obtained by interviewers in real cases was shared with parents who also questioned their children. D) Children in the experiments were much older than children in the day care center cases.

D. ) Children in the experiments were much older than children in the day care center cases.

Explanation: There are varying contrast in the techniques adopted in the research or experimental study and the real cases which allowed the outcome of the experiment to differ substantially from real world scenario. Even though the participant involved in the study belong to the same age bracket as those used in the experiment, bias introduced due to forceful and repeated questioning and disclosing questions to parents ensured that children in the real cases were more likely to disagree with misleading questions than in the experimental research.

i am a priest who cares deeply about the church. i have been called here to explain my views on indulgences and other proposed reforms. i would like to explain why my views are consistent with the bible and are correct.