subject
Social Studies, 02.04.2020 16:30 lizzzzi7908

I need help can someone check if this is correct?


I need help can someone check if this is correct?

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:00, sadcase85
Which statement best explains how world war ii to end the great depression? a. new job opportunities opened as the united states produced more military products. b. the u. s. army provided new jobs that paid better than any other work at the time. c. people had to worry more about war problems than about the economic crisis. d. the war caused people to trust the economy enough to spend more money.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:20, nerdywolf2003
Name three things the framers of the constitution did to keep the federal government or any part of it from becoming too powerful.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30, hsernaykaw42
The primary purpose of a certificate of confidentiality is to: allow law enforcement to investigate abuse cases. protect researchers from disclosing conflicts of interest. prevent subjects from knowing the purpose of a study. protect identifiable research information from compelled disclosure.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
I need help can someone check if this is correct?
...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Arts, 16.04.2021 02:20
Konu
History, 16.04.2021 02:20