If someone who did not accept scientific claims that climate is changing read "nothing about the science of climate change can be called into question at this point, because there is a consensus among 97 percent of scientists," that person could, based on this quote, make the argument that there is a fallacy in the climate change argument.

the most likely outcome of fewer loon territories is that hawks would increase in proportion because the benefit of victory would be greater. hawks and loons are natural rivals of resources and victories in the game, since the lakes drying up affected the loons, the hawks would be benefited from the drought.

if you have to make a general question and respond to your thoughts, then this isn't really a question someone can you on. read the passage, form your question, and answer using your thoughts. no one else can understand how you interpreted this text if you don't tell us.