Who should have the power to define abnormality? Societies (popular vote), political groups, governmental/legal agencies, or mental health professionals?

What might be the advantages and disadvantages to allowing one or all of these groups have the final say?

Governmental/legal agencies,

Explanation: Allowing a government or legal agency to have a say on abnormality will have huge advantages of making the populace see it as very vital the need to maintain normal process of doing things without violating set out laws and order. The disadvantage is that the agency might violate the laws which they have the power to speak against and no one will have the audacity to confront them with full force.

colony: virginia

1: 1607,john smith

2: british were looking for gold and land

3: near oceans and theres forests

4: fishing? ithink

5: sometimes

this doesn't support enough information to answer the question.