Robert played college football and is now a high school football coach. Robert has basic concepts of special terms to include the punt return, extra point unit, and kick-off return. Magnus, an immigrant from Denmark, is learning the game of American football. Magnus has basic concepts of offense and defense.
The difference between Robert and Magnus's levels of concepts is MOST likely attributed to:

A) type 1 and type 2 thinking.
B) algorithms and heuristics.
C) expertise and cultural background.
D) durability bias and affective forecasting.

My solution to this problem is subjective. The difference between Robert and Magnus's levels of concepts is MOST likely attributed to Algorithms & Heuristics

Explanation:

It is subjective in the sense that an Algorithm is a defined set of rules and/or steps used to solve specific problems. ... While Algorithms will come up with solid answers (and usually the same answer each time).

Heuristics will allow the user's experience to inform decisions that might take more time but it certain to work through.

In one hand, the difference between Robert and Magnus's levels of concepts is MOST likely attributed to the fact that Robert had played college football and is now a high school football coach. Robert has basic concepts of special terms to include the punt return, extra point unit, and kick-off return will be applying the heuristic method in American football which needs prompt and quick decisions to contain the incursions of your opponents.

On the other hand, Magnus, an immigrant from Denmark, who learns the game of American football and has basic concepts of offence and defence will be inclined to use the algorithm methodology to approach his basic skills which not very good in games. This is because algorithmic patterns take time to plan and execute which may be counter-productive given the dynamism of the human reflexes need to attend to actions of opponents in a football game.

rain should be the answer.