GR8 Stuf Company files a registration statement with the SEC before making an offering to the general public. The registration contains false, immaterial statements of which the investors are unaware. GR8 Stuf is charged with violating the Securities Act of 1933. GR8 Stuf’s best defense is:

d. the untrue statements were not material.

Explanation:

If the untrue statements were IMMATERIAL, the company could argue that including them did not adversely affect the interests of the investors because the company will still run more or less the same regardless of the untrue statement.

They would essentially be admitting to lying or falsely providing information but they saying that it did not matter MATERIALLY if they included the statements or not, the result would likely be the same.

The SEC requires that only information which will be relevant to the determination of if an investor will buy stock should be presented according to the aforementioned act. GR8 does not consider the untrue statement relevant enough to prevent an investor from investing and so could argue based on that point.

b.letter b

explanation:

section 7. all bills for raising revenue shall originate in the house of representatives; but the senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other bills.

explanation: mark brainliest i am trying to get to the next level ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

i will you and send a freind request