Consistent bite mark evidence alone is not sufficient for a conviction, but it does provide evidence that may be helpful in building a case.

Circumstantial.

Explanation:

As per the question, the 'consistent bite marks' alone would not be able to ensure the conviction of the guilty but it, however, serves as 'circumstantial evidence' because it was collected directly from the crime scene that could prove fruitful in developing the case further. Such evidence turn quite helpful in supporting the truth or substantiating the claims but to validate the conviction, more factual evidence would be required to prove the accused to be guilty of the crime. Therefore, 'circumstantial' is the correct answer.

your answer should be c, it seems to be the only one that makes sense. mark me branliest : )

glass wants to live in a world of super heroes and villains. he have lived all his life trying to be responsible for the creating the origin story of a super hero; he schemed and caused many incidents (many of them fatal) hoping that someday someone with superpowers would show up and save the day.

he knew himself very much. he saw himself as a villain of a real-life super hero story. he was aware of his strengths (more than smart enough for being manipulative and scheming) and weaknesses (having fragile bones and having to rely on his mind to succeed).