Social Studies, 05.03.2020 17:08 yedida

Which statement explains the significance of the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?
Criminal suspects have the right to not give evidence against themselves. Criminal suspects have the right to a free lawyer provided by the court.
Criminal suspects have the same right to due process even if underage.
Criminal suspects have the right to not have a jury decide the case.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40, hotrdks946

The specific department of health and human services (hhs) regulations that apply to research with children are known as: subpart b: additional protections for children involved as subjects in researchsubpart a: the common rulesubpart d: additional protections for children involved as subjects in researchsubpart c: protections for children in research

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:00, onepunchman20

In the construction of a new housing development which factor of production can be categorized as land?

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:30, ronnie7898

Alexander stephens’ opinion on secession and compromise led to what being written? a)the kansas-nebraska act b)the missouri compromise c)the u. s. constitution d)the georgia platform

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31, ilonkaip6323

Can someone me answer all the questions?

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

Which statement explains the significance of the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?
Criminal suspe...