After surveying 100 parents, researchers concluded that 90 percent of babies can walk by the age of 10 months. Why is this an inappropriate conclusion?

The conclusion drawn is inappropriate because the data collection is unreliable and the method used for collection is wrong.

Explanation:

The use of wrong methods for the collection of data for such studies and then drawing conclusions out of them is one of the causes for the study to be said to be unreliable completely.

There is no way to reliably conclude the age at which the children start to walk by talking to the parents as parents do not qualify or take time data of the time children start walking.

The parents are unreliable sources here no matter how big the sample size is and only the researchers themselves could notice and get the reliable results required in this case.

if you are on the computer you can not take a picture but you can upload one but i am not sure about phones but i'm pretty sure it's the but to upload one just click the paper clip looking thing/ link thingy thing and upload a pic

the language of nature was a manifestation from god as he said "let there be light" and there was light the world began to assume visible, comprehensible form.

what ever we know now think of the old vision of creation we can be sure that with out the speaking of word -without language- we would have no science today with its striking power to illuminate the world.