subject
Social Studies, 03.03.2020 03:21 tiffanibell71

Dr. Cirillo divided her first-period class into two groups. One group had to read 20 pages in a boring psychology text, but would get 2 extra points on the next test. The other group also read 20 pages but were given 25 points added to the next test. The class members were then asked to tell the second-period class how interesting the book was. According to the results of the Festinger and Carlsmith study, what predictions could one make about the remarks of the first-period class?A) The first-period class would say the pages were interesting but the second-period class would say the pages were boring.
B) The first-period class would say the pages were boring but the second-period class would not.
C) Both groups would say the pages were interesting.
D) Both groups would say the pages were boring.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30, aprilreneeclaroxob0c
Immigrants arriving in the united states during the late 1800s experienced many difficulties. which of the following was a problem which large numbers of immigrants faced?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:30, laytonlutz
Radiation was first detected by a ?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:00, Najibddahir45
{[ hoi! ]} which was not the name of a french government branch? a. directory b. national convention c. constitution d. national assembly
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Dr. Cirillo divided her first-period class into two groups. One group had to read 20 pages in a bori...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 12.03.2021 17:40