On her first visit to China, Jane did not know how to pay for the produce she had selected at a market. She watched several Chinese women pay for their selections, and then Jane copied their behavior. In this example, Jane used .

The correct answer is: Modeling.

Explanation:

Modeling in psychology can be understood as a method or technique introduced by psychologist Albert Bandura, that states that individuals can learn behaviors by imitating others.

For example, a teenager learns to kick the football by watching his best friend who is an experienced player do it. The teenager imitates the way his friend kicks the ball. His friend serves as a model for him.

In this particular case, On her first visit to China, Jane did not know how to pay for the produce she had selected at a market. She watched several Chinese women pay for their selections, and then Jane copied their behavior. In this example, Jane used modeling.

Question Options:

A) shaping

B) stimulus discrimination

C) modeling

D) stimulus generalisation.

Modeling involves the learning of a new skill by copying other people. This method is used in cognitive-behavioral techniques of psychotherapy whereby an individual learns solely by copying.

This concept was introduced by introduced by Albert Bandura in his famous 1961 Bobo doll experiment.

Jane copying/imitating the behavior of of other Chinese women is an example of modeling.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )