Quizlet For this discussion question look at the first two presidents (Washington and Adams) and discuss their administrations and the issues with which the new nation was having to deal. What was the accomplishments or significance of both Washington's and Adam's terms as president. Also, specifically analyze the rise of the party system. Who were the Federalists and the Democratic-Republican, who were the leaders of these parties and what were the ideologies of this first party system (issues that each side supported)?

Federalists were in favor of the strong government for the betterment of the country where as the democratic republic feared too strong central government.

Explanation:

Federalists trusted in a solid administrative republican government drove by educated, open lively men of property. The Democratic-Republicans, then again, dreaded an excessive amount of government power and concentrated more on the provincial regions of the nation, which they thought were underrepresented and undeserved.

The Federalists accepted that Democratic-Republican analysis of Federalist strategies was unfaithful and expected that outsiders living in the United States would identify with the French during a war. Therefore, a Federalist-controlled Congress passed four laws, referred to by and large as the Alien and Sedition Acts.

for many centuries there were important factors which the economies of the muslim empires developed increasingly. they applied economic procedures in production, investment, finance, taxation and property. they used to tax certain goods (for example: harvest), they charged interest on money lent, they signed contracts with merchants; they relied on a common currency, and they used checks as well as promissory notes. with the money collected by means of taxation, the government provided the needy with an income. in addition, trading networks covered huge distances, so far regions started to have contact and exchange goods. this trade network covered areas of asia, africa and europe.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals