According to Brutus, what is wrong with the government proposed by the constitution? What branch of government is the most dangerous?

loss of sovereignty

Legislative

Explanation:

The main objection against the government proposed by the constitution by the Brutus was that formation of one great republican government would lead to loss of sovereignty of respective states and they would lose their identity to that of common identity.  

Instead, Antifederalist (Brutus) favoured an arrangement of 13 confederate republics which would allow them to exercise their respectable autonomy.

According to Brutus Legislative branch of the government is most dangerous. In the Context of the United States, relatively unbridled power of the Congress to collect revenue and to borrow money on the credit of US and other clauses are a source of concern for US citizens at large.

According to the Brutus the laws of every state becomes nullified if they are inconsistent with the constitution.The federal government is the most dangerous

Explanation:

Brutus was against the government proposed by the constitution because he believed that the proposed government failed to address the issues pertaining to the individual rights and it posses a threat to the liberties enjoyed by the general public

the factors that the economies of the muslim empires prosper were:

1- land trade routes-located between three continents  

2- sea trade routes

trade contributed to the spread of muslim empires, and with that islamic culture led to a growing feeling of internationalism resulted in the transfer of technology, science, and other cultural forms.