The Fifth Amendment protections: a. apply to corporations. b. can be used by officers of a corporation to prevent disclosure of corporate records. c. can be used by officers of a corporation to prevent disclosure of corporate records that incriminate them. d. none of the above

d. none of the above.

Explanation:

The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of United States provides a number of rights which are applicable to criminal and civil proceedings which includes the right of the grand jury to investigate potentially criminal acts before any criminal charges has been enforced, the right to double jeopardy has been prohibited, the right against self-incrimination and the protection against unlawful confiscation of private property without fair compensation by the government.

However the Fifth amendment do not apply to corporations.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

the structure of state governments are determined by. "state constitutins'

under the us constitution, all state governments are.'republics'