To suggest that capital punishment is a different moral question for nomadic peoples living in tents, or other temporary shelters, than it is for societies with maximum-security prisons, involves what kind of reasoning?A) Utilitarianism
B) Natural law
C) Relativism
D) Kantian

Relativism  

Explanation:

Relativism is the part of meta-ethics. It is discussed widely out from the philosophical. This topic is controversial among philosophers and non-philosophers. Some philosophers are quite critical about the relativism. But other philosophers favor the formation of the moral relativism. It was not so much hot topic among philosophers in the 20th century.  

Thus capital punishment is a different moral question for Nomadic peoples who were living in tents. So that the societies need more security prisons involved the relativism.  

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.