subject
Social Studies, 26.02.2020 05:50 sm908361

A trainer arranged for one of her employee training groups to see the video made from the book Effective Time Management, while all her other training groups read the book without seeing the video. She wanted to know whether videos could be used as effective aids in teaching time management. She tested each group for knowledge and ability to apply the concepts covered after each type of instruction. On all tests, the group that saw the video did better. This group became so interested in Effective Time Management that most individuals in the group chose to read the book, for the first time, entirely on their own initiative.
There was no evidence that the training group that saw the video understood or appreciated Effective Time Management more than the training group that read the book without seeing the video.

a. True
b. Probably True
c. Probably False
d. False
e. Insufficient Data

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:50, emilyy47
Read case #5 - "targeting target" (on pages 77-78 of your textbook), then answer the following questions: do you think it was ethical for authorities to use one of the high-ranking members to trap other gang members? why or why not? how would you approach the target situation? use the internet to research and find the best practices to protect from identity theft.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:00, natalie1755
Newspaper started by john campbell:
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40, jalenshayewilliams
Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries. your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for. in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources. the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50, datboi995
Which of the following is not true about the supreme court?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A trainer arranged for one of her employee training groups to see the video made from the book Effec...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 26.07.2019 22:50