Andrea and Lily went together to watch a movie. Andrea was very excited to watch the movie, whereas Lily was absolutely bored and disinterested. While Andrea liked the script and the message of the movie, Lily liked only the location and the clothes worn by the lead actors in the movie. Based on this information, one can infer that Lily:
a. has a high need for cognition.
b. reflects on persuasive messages by employing central route processing.
c. makes judgments based on logical and complex messages.
d. is persuaded by using peripheral route processing.

The term civil liberties refers to specific individual rights that

Identify the statements that correctly identify a fact about georgia's five regions.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.