In choosing sides concerning CEO duality, two schools of thought exist. Which of the following would be a consideration for the Unity of Command school of thought? Multiple Choice CEO duality results in improved leadership efficiency and effectiveness. CEO duality leads to confusion in the decision-making process. CEO duality decreases the responsiveness of the leadership to shareholder needs. CEO duality does not provide clear focus on objectives and operations.

CEO duality results in improved leadership efficiency and effectiveness

Explanation:

Unity of command school of thought holds the position that a subordinate reports/answers to only one supervisor, who in turn is responsible to only one supervisor, and in that order all the way up the organizational hierarchy regardless of whether the top management of the organization is led by a group of people. Unity of Command school of thought does not support CEO duality.

texas governor sam houston opposed secession, but was unable to prevent it. in this speech, given prior to lincoln's election, he presents the argument that slavery would be safer within the united states than outside of it. it was a prescient argument, and one held by several other southern leaders.

have a good day pls vote me brailyest