The Australian government has opened a for-profit tourist information center in New York City. If a dispute arises over the lease of the storefront, may the landlord sue the Australian government in the United States courts?

a. Yes, because the Australian government was engaged in a commercial activity.
b. No, because the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act forbids U. S. courts from hearing any case (without exception) that involves a foreign government.
c. No, because the only way the Australian government can be sued is if it signed a written waiver of immunity.
d. Yes, because the Australian government violated international law.

a. Yes, because the Australian government was engaged in a commercial activity.

explanation:

actually, not all representation was acceptable based on this little piece of article, in 1776, the second continental congress issued the declaration of independence, stating their specific grievances with the british monarchy and why they were going to create a separate government. after the colonies separated from the british monarchy and formed the united states of america, they had to answer some crucial questions: 1) if not a monarchy, what type of government was the united states going to have? 2) what kind of government was going to protect the people without violating their individual liberties?

what are the answer choices?