A recent article stated that adding energy drinks to alcohol was associated with an elevated blood alcohol content compared to consuming alcohol without energy drinks in college students. Complete parts a and b below. a. Suppose this conclusion was based on a significance test comparing means. Defining notation in context, identify the groups and the population means and state the null hypothesis for the test. Identify the groups for the test. A. The two groups were students consuming energy drinks (Group 1) and students not consuming energy drinks (Group 2). B. The two groups were students consuming alcohol with energy drinks (Group 1) and students just consuming alcohol (Group 2). C. The two groups were alcoholic drinks mixed with energy drinks (Group 1) and alcoholic drinks without energy drinks (Group 2). D. The two groups were students consuming alcohol (Group 1) and students not consuming alcohol (Group 2).

Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)