After Suzi's purse got stolen, the police asked her to look at mug shots to try to identify the perpetrator. After looking at several images, Suzi felt that they became blurred together in her mind—she no longer felt confident that she would be able to identify the man who stole her purse. In fact, she could no longer recall whether he had a moustache or not. The suggestibility of memory raises serious questions about using for courtroom evidence.

Eyewitness Testimony.

Explanation:

The term eyewitness testimony is a legal term that is used for the people who give an account of a certain event witnessed by them. This person can be the bystander or the victim himself. The account given by the eyewitness is usually descriptive. The person is required to describe the event in detail of how it started and what happened afterward. Eyewitness testimony includes crime details, perpetrator's identification, etc.

In the given context, the testimony of eyewitness is questionable because Suzi is not able to memorize the face of the perpetrator.

So, the correct answer is eyewitness testimony.

i'm not sure what you are asking, but it also served as a debtors colony, was ran by the trustees for 20 years until becoming a royal colony, and people had restrictions such as no slaves, and only 50 acres of land per person/ hope this !

- jack watson