Review the reading, lecture and video resources for this week. Your answer should demonstrate your familiarity with the course materials. Critically evaluate the position called substance dualism. Explanation: To critically evaluate an idea means to explain the larger context within which it arises, to introduce the main issues or questions, to summarize and evaluate the relevant arguments, and then to make one’s own assessment. I suggest these steps: 1. Explain that the mind/body problem is. 2.Explain what substance dualism is. 3. Summarize and critique the strongest argument for substance dualism and the strongest argument against it. 4. Offer your own best solution to "the mind/body problem."

This type of dualism describes that each mind is a distinct nonphysical res, an individual cluster of nonphysical substance, a thing whose properties are independent of a body that may be "connected". According to her, mental states come from these same non-physical, distinct and unique properties of substance.

A division of reality into two basic types of substance: the first was the ordinary type that had the characteristic of occupying a place in space, having length, width and height. Although the connotation of the material substance seemed to have no importance, it was largely exacerbated by Descartes, where his writings would serve as the basis for Newton's mechanical extrapolations.

However, there was a substance that was beyond its reach of explanation by mechanics. This substance was human conscious reason. This meant that Descartes proposed a different type of substance. A substance without extension or place in space, where its essential characteristic was the human activity of thinking.

The most acceptable point of the theory is that the mind and body performed different functions, and the most acceptable criticism is that the two worked together.

I believe it is a good theory, but the truth is that it is an erroneous theory, but for the time it was a revolution and it was from there that one began to understand the concept of what would be the "mind". The solution is that the theory is wrong, but it has led to great achievements today.

earthquake fault lines