The good Samaritan study conducted by Darley and Batson(1973) examined helping behavior in seminary students at Princeton University. These students were either rushed or not rushed to get to an appointment. Results of this study showed that
1.participants who viewed religion as a means toward personal salvation were less likely to help someone than participants who viewed religion as a mean toward moral and spiritual values.
2.when rushed, only participants who viewed religion as a means toward personal salvation were less likely to help someone.
3.when rushed, only participants who viewed religion as a means toward moral and spiritual values were less likely to help someone
4.the nature of participants' religious orientations did not predict helping behavior; only being rushed or not predicted helping.

4.the nature of participants' religious orientations did not predict helping behavior; only being rushed or not predicted helping

Explanation:

The Good Samaritan study was conducted by Princeton social psychologists, John Darley and Daniel Batson, taking inspiration from the parable of the Good Samaritan. Their research was conducted to test people's disposition regarding the acts of the Good Samaritan. They published their results in a 1973 paper titled “From Jerusalem to Jericho.” where they showed "the nature of participants' religious orientations did not predict helping behavior; only being rushed or not predicted helping."

was the answer correct?

even though you have attached neither the chart nor the generalizations, i have located them online. the right answer is d, since they are asking you about a generalization. you can only infer from the chart that between 2008 and 2009 the number of employed workers decreased significantly (from over 115 millions to 107 millions approximately), which signals some type of economic crisis.