According to the textbook, whistle-blowing is justified if 3 conditions are satisfied. One condition is that there is strong evidence that the organization is doing something that is hurting or will hurt other parties. What are the other two conditions?

1. When there is a documented evidence.

2. When immediate supervisor does not act accordingly

Explanation:1. when the employee must have documented a true and convincing evidence to a reasonable level and the facts proved to the outside public.

2. When no action is taken inspire the best efforts of the employees to remedy the situation of unethical action.

all you have to do is look at the pictures to find hope this is the lesson you were also hope this .

what he said above me         look up that's the answer