subject
Social Studies, 14.02.2020 02:10 edulak5726

Assume that John and Tina show up to a publicly funded office occupied by the incumbent that they are trying to unseat. They decide to do a silent protest where they say nothing, but wear T-shirts with a picture of the other candidate. The incumbent asks that they be removed from the premises. Which of the following is correct?
A) The T-shirts would not constitute speech under the First Amendment since there has been nothing said.
B) The T-shirts would not constitute speech under the First Amendment since they only have pictures on them

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30, ineedhelp2285
Passage 2 — from catherine beecher, “treatise on the domestic economy”it appears, then, that it is in america, alone, that women are raised to equality with the other sex; and that, both in theory and practice, their interests are regarded as of equal value. they are made subordinate in station, only where a regard to their best interests demands it, while, as if in compensation for this, by custom and courtesy, they are always treated as superiors. universally in this country, through every class of society, precedence is given to woman, in all the comforts, conveniences, and courtesies, of life. in civil and political affairs, american women take no interest or concern, except so far as they sympathize with their family and personal friends; but in all cases, in which they do feel a concern, their opinions and feelings have a consideration, equal, or even superior, to that of the other sex. in matters pertaining to the education of their children, in the selection and support of a clergyman; in all benevolent enterprises, and in all questions relating to morals or manners, they have a superior influence. in such concerns, it would be impossible to carry a point, contrary to their judgment and feelings; while an enterprise, sustained by them, will seldom fail of success. if those who are bewailing themselves over the fancied wrongs and injuries of woman in this nation, could only see things as they are, they would know, that, whatever remnants of a barbarous or aristocratic age may remain in our civil institutions, in reference to the interests of women, it is only because they are ignorant of them, or do not use their influence to have them rectified; for it is very certain that there is nothing reasonable, which american women would unite in asking, that would not readily be bestowed. the preceding remarks, then, illustrate the position, that the democratic institutions of this country are in reality no other than the principles of christianity carried into operation, and that they tend to place woman in her true position in society, as having equal rights with the other sex; and that, in fact they have secured to american women a lofty and fortunate position, which, as yet, has been attained by the women of no other nation. analysis1. when beecher speaks of women’s “best interests” and their “true position in society,” what does she mean? 2. according to beecher, what trade-offs must american women make to obtain their “lofty and fortunate position” in society? in your view, is it a fair exchange? 3. according to beecher, in what realms do women naturally and legitimately exercise power? 4. on what grounds does beecher base her faith that american women can attain anything they “reasonably” ask, and how does she explain any “remnants” of bad treatment that might remain in the present?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:00, angryapple1133
"people are the greatest resource that a country has". justify.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00, milkshakegrande101
What are the qualifications to be a member of the house of representatives
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:10, Treezy11
In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Assume that John and Tina show up to a publicly funded office occupied by the incumbent that they ar...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 26.02.2020 17:38
Konu
Social Studies, 26.02.2020 17:38