The power of theories lies in their ability to:
Capture the complexity of human nature by the richness of the operational definitions associated with the variables
Prove conclusively that relationships exist among the phenomena studied
Minimize the number of words required to explain phenomena and thereby eliminate semantic problems
Articulate the nature of the relationships among phenomena

D). Articulate the nature of the relationships among phenomena.

Explanation:

A theory is demonstrated as the formal statement that aims to describe or elucidate a specific process or idea on the basis of general principles.

As per the question, the central power of theories prevails in their ability to 'articulate the nature of the relationships among phenomena' on the grounds of general laws and principles rationally. These acts to provide an understanding of these relationships and acts authentic supporting evidence to substantiate a particular claim or reach a conclusion regarding these phenomena. It also assists in evaluating as well as extending the present knowledge along with providing the explanation and understanding. Therefore, option D is the correct answer.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

i'd have to with d.

explanation: