Goldman may have won the Supervisor of the Year award, but that just means they didn’t look very hard for a winner. I know a couple of people who work in Goldman’s division and they say that he’s a real pain to work for. I’d sooner trust my friends than some awards committee.

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

What if the united states, mexico, and canada took the eu’s example and joined to forms north american union ? based on your knowledge of the europe union, describe two setbacks or hurdles that this idea might face

Question 2 of 102 pointshow did the protestant reformation impact the european enlightenment? oa. it convinced many europeans that only biblical laws should befollowed. ob. it required christians to sign a social contract with the protestantchurchoc. it created a new christian country with a republican form ofgovernmentd. it led many people to question the idea that a king's power camefrom god.