Marilyn brought her $300 silk dress to University Dry Cleaners to be cleaned. On the back of the ticket she received in exchange for the dress was written, "Liability limited to ten times the cost of cleaning." Marilyn's dress was lost and University now claims it owes her only $56.50, ten times the cost of cleaning. Is that true?
Question 7 options:

No, because the limitation is unconscionable.

No, because the cleaners is not a common carrier.

No, because Marilyn is not a bailor.

No, because the limitation was not communicated to her.

No, because the limitation was not communicated to her.

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is not true because the limitation was not communicated to her. Since she walked into a store and asked to have her dress cleaned, the individual at the front desk should have explicitly mentioned the pricing and policy to her so that she knew what she was accepting by leaving her dress at the store. Since they did not do this then they must pay her the $300 that the dress is worth.

ya i know i wanna was a good night i wanna was a good night i love y’all bye is your address again call tomorrow morning i love ya bye hi hi i’m going crazy about going to the school and i don’t know if y’all want me or not going tomorrow and i’ll tell you what i’m doing and i’ll y’all with this i’m gonna was a really bad thing to say i don’t think i can but i’ll give ya my friend tomorrow night i love you and y’all so i don’t have a lot to say about you haha is this what time you should be home and i’ll give ya my number so i’m sorry i’ll call y’all bye love ya hey

should congress have the power to interpret the constitution? write a paragraph in which you argue for or against the wide application of the limplied power